|
| |
Greed
A Sermon Given
by Rev. Roger Fritts
on April 27, 2003
at Cedar Lane Unitarian Universalist Church
Bethesda, Maryland
Mark 10:25, "It is easier for a camel to squeeze through a needle’s eye
than for a wealthy person to get into God’s domain!"
According to news reports this past week, Donald J. Carty,
the Chief Executive Officer of American Airlines, convinced American Airlines
pilots, mechanics, flight attendants and baggage handlers, that they had to
accept major pay cuts ranging from 15 to 23 percent to help the airline avoid
bankruptcy. At the same time he secretly created retention bonuses for
American Airlines’ top seven executives that would reward them for staying at
their jobs until 2005. All but one of the bonuses were set at twice these
executives’ annual salaries. Donald Carty’s own bonus was 1.6 million dollars.
In addition, at the same time that he was telling pilots
that the company would eliminate their pension plans if it had to file for
bankruptcy, Carty secretly created a special pension trust for the company’s
top 45 executives that could not be touched even by bankruptcy. Carty and
three other executives were to be paid extra for administrating this trust.
This is not just income from ticket sales, American Airlines is slated to
receive a $410 million emergency appropriation of our federal tax money.
Under attack Friday, Donald Carty resigned as chairperson
and CEO of American Airlines. He is just the latest example of leaders who
have been attacked in the media for their attempts to take more money for
themselves at a time when the economy has turned sour for many people.
Last fall the news was filled with reports about the
extraordinary retirement package for former General Electric CEO Jack Welch.
The man whose fortune is estimated at $900 million, the man who was paid $16
million in his last year as CEO of GE, was getting about $2.5 million a year
in lifetime retirement perks from GE.
Last summer there were news reports that Tyco, had agreed
to pay a severance package of $45 million to an executive even though he was
already under criminal investigation by a grand jury. Tyco also covered the
cost of fixing up the former chief executive’s Fifth Avenue apartment at a
cost of $14 million, including a $6,300 sewing basket, a $2,200 gilt metal
wastebasket, two sets of sheets for $5,960, a $445 pincushion, and a $15,000
antique umbrella stand in the shape of a three-foot-high poodle.
A recent study shows that, 20 years ago, the average
chief executive officer of a publicly traded company made 42 times more than
the average production worker. The same study shows that today the average
present-day CEO makes 400 times the average employee's income.
According to one study, total compensation of American
CEOs is more than twice as high as that of their Japanese and European
counterparts, even allowing for benefits, such as company cars and clothing
allowances, that tend to be more common overseas.
Even President Bush thinks there is a problem. Speaking to
executives on Wall Street last July 9, he said "There’s no capitalism without
conscience; there is no wealth without character. We need men and women of
character, who know the difference between ambition and destructive greed."
The question I wonder about, is why do some of us strive
for more and more money, and more things than we can buy with that money? Why
did Donald Carty of American Airlines try to give more wealth to himself and
to other top executives? What were they going to do with those extra millions?
Why did they feel that getting more money was a good idea?
Being a middle class Unitarian Universalist minister, I do
not have access to wealthy executives and therefore I do not have
opportunities to interview them or observe them first hand. From a distance I
try to imagine what might be going on inside them. What drives people to
accumulate lots of things and lots of money?
Power must be one answer to this question. People who have
money have power. Depending on the person that can be a good thing or a bad
thing. I talked with a minister who had made millions of dollars a few years
ago on the books he wrote. He told a group of us that the nicest thing about
having money was the power that came with it. When funds were cut back for
support to the planned parenthood clinic in his community, as a minister he
could preach a sermon or write a newsletter column or send a letter to the
local newspaper. But as a successful writer, he took out his checkbook and
wrote a check to Planned-Parenthood that completely replaced all the funds
that had been cut. Money gives us power.
There are many such examples of people generously giving
away money for good causes. It may be this is one of the motivations behind
the CEOs and top executives at places like American Airlines, and Tyco, and
World Com and Enron and the other companies that have been involved in
scandals over the past two years. We human beings are complex and sometimes
the same person who acts in greedy ways also acts in generous ways.
Another explanation for the accumulation of excessive
wealth is that each of us has an inner drive to gain a sense of personal
worth, of significance, of importance. We want to gain an assurance that we
matter in the scheme of things.
Perhaps greed is a result of our desire to generate or
repair or maintain a sense of our own worth and importance. The money is not
for the purpose of buying things but rather a way of measuring self worth.
This may explain the greedy behavior we see in human beings.
If we achieve power and self worth through money, the hope
is that we will be happy.
When asked in a study how satisfied we were with
different aspects of life, including our friends, our house, and our
schooling, Americans expressed least satisfaction with "the amount of money
you have to live on."
When asked in a study what hampers our search for the
good life? Americans most frequently answered, "We’re short of money."
When asked in a study what would improve our quality of
life? Americans first answer was often, "more money." Except for those with
the highest incomes, most of us think, that 10 to 20 percent more money will
bring more happiness.
According to a Gallop poll, four in five people earning
more than seventy-five thousand dollars a year say that they would like to
be rich.
In the American Council on Education’s annual survey of
over 200,000 students entering college, the proportion of college students
agreeing that an important reason for their going to college was "to make
more money" rose from one in two in 1971 to nearly three in four by 1990.
The number of college students who considered it very
important or essential that they become "very well-off financially," rose
from 39 percent in 1970 to 74 percent in 1990.
But does money buy happiness?
Obviously in modern society we need money to buy food,
shelter and clothing. In Britain, France, the Netherlands, and West Germany at
the end of World War II, housing and food supplies were insufficient and
self-reported happiness was scarce. As the economies of these countries
rebounded to provide for people's needs, happiness rebounded also.
But after a certain point the relationship between higher
income and greater happiness is modest. Having more than enough provides
little additional boost to well-being. A University of Illinois psychologist
surveyed forty-nine of the wealthiest Americans, as listed by Forbes,
and found them to be only slightly happier than average.
In national surveys what matters more than absolute wealth
is perceived wealth. Actual income doesn't much influence happiness, but how
satisfied we are with our income does. If we are content with our income,
regardless of how much it is, we are likely to say we are happy. There is only
a slight tendency for people who make lots of money to be more satisfied with
what they make.
Over time, does our happiness grow with our paychecks? In
the United States as a whole, the answer is clearly no. Since the 1950s, our
buying power has doubled. In 1957 our per person income, expressed in today’s
dollars, was seventy-five hundred dollars. By 1990 it was over fifteen
thousand. We have twice as many cars. We have color TVs, VCRs, home computers,
air-conditioners, micro wave ovens, garage door openers, answering machines,
and brand-name athletic shoes. But are we happier?
In 1957, one in three Americans told the University of
Chicago’s National Opinion Research Center they were "very happy." Recently
exactly the same number, one in three said they were "very happy." All the
money, and all the gadgets made no difference in the percentage of people
who said they were very happy.
Between 1955 and 1971 the average income of Detroit
families increased 40 percent in constant dollars. Yet compared to Detroit
housewives in 1955, those interviewed in 1971 were no more satisfied with
their "standard of living, the kind of house, clothes, car, and so forth."
Between 1956 and 1988, the percentage of Americans who
reported they were "pretty well satisfied with their present financial
situation" dropped from 42 to 30 percent.
The research evidence is that after a certain point, making
more money and having more things does not lead to happiness, contentment or
joy. We can buy and eat the best meal in the best restaurant in Washington,
and that might make us happy. However, buying and eating the best meal in the
best restaurant a second time is not likely to make us twice as happy. Once
beyond poverty, further economic growth does not significantly increase human
well-being.
Still the belief that we will be happy if we accumulate
things or accumulate money is strong inside us. I remember in my childhood, a
period of time starting when I was about nine years old and lasting for about
three years, when I was a collector. I had a rock collection. I had a comic
book collection. I had a postage stamp collection. I saved old magazines.
When I was 15 I started reading psychology books in an
attempt to understand myself and others. In a book by Erich Fromm I came
across a passage about what he called the "Hoarding Orientation."
This German Jewish psychologist described the hoarder as a
person who feels ‘the source of all good’ to be outside of themselves.
Whatever one wants to get must be sought there, and one cannot produce
anything important oneself. The aim of a hoarder is to bring as much as
possible into their control. The more they have, the more secure they feel. I
thought back to that time when I was a collector, and that is certainly how I
felt. Collecting things helped me feel more secure.
I do not know for sure what goes on in the mind of a person
who struggles to make more and more money, much more money than they or their
family could possibly need. However, I wonder if they have the same feelings
inside that I had back when I was a collector. Back then I did not have much
confidence in myself or my own ability to create, or be productive. The more
stuff I gathered around me the more secure I felt. When I see news stories
about people who build houses with many more rooms than they need, or who own
several homes they do not use, or who collect expensive things like antique
cars, I wonder if they have regressed back to that emotional state I went
through many years ago when I was a collector.
In my teenage years, at some point, I began to feel that I
could be productive, creative, and that I had power. I could sing a song. I
could cook a meal. I could write a letter. I could grow a plant. I could tell
a joke. I could paint a room. I could throw a ball. I could develop
friendships with other people.
As I felt more productive and powerful inside, all the
stuff I had collected became a burden. I lost interest in saving old comic
books. It all gathered dust in my room, until one day I dumped everything but
the stamp collection into the trash. I did not completely give up collecting.
I still have that stamp collection (although in retrospect it might have been
better if I had saved the comic books). Still when I got rid of most of the
stuff, I felt liberated.
When I hear about people who strive to accumulate enormous
wealth, and buy expensive things, I wonder if they have ever felt the freedom
that comes from not being burdened with lots of stuff. I wonder if they are
empty inside. Perhaps this emptiness is what drives them to buy a $15,000
antique umbrella stand in the shape of a three-foot-high poodle. I would guess
that this is the act of a person who suffers from very poor judgment, or is
seriously unhappy.
To Donald Carty of American Airlines and Jack Welch of
General Electric, and to the failed executives of Enron and Tyco and World
Com, I can only say that in my experience the special moments of happiness are
the ordinary things. A simple, good meal. Small talk with a friend. Playing a
game. Going for a walk. Reading a good book. Singing a song. Weeding a garden.
Taking a bath or a shower. Playing golf or tennis. Playing with children.
Going to church. These are sources of happiness.
To anyone who feels the need to spend $2,200 on a
wastebasket, I offer these words by Wendell Berry at no charge. Wendell wrote:
I sat one summer evening and watched a great blue heron
make his descent from the top of the hill into the valley. He came down at a
measured deliberate pace, stately as always, like a dignitary going down a
stair. And then, at a point I judged to be midway over the river, without at
all varying his wing beat he did a backward turn in the air, a
loop–the–loop. It could only have been a gesture of pure exuberance, of
joy—a speaking of his sense of the evening, the day's fulfillment, his
descent homeward. He made just the one slow turn, and then flew on out of
sight in the direction of a slew farther down in the bottom. The movement
was incredibly beautiful, at once exultant and stately, a benediction on the
evening and on the river and on me.
In such ordinary moments human happiness is found. These
moments are all around us, if we take the time to see them.
Office@CedarLane.org
|